requestId:68753bfc2a5194.64493017.
“Traveling on the Road” and the original order experience: A new interpretation of “Synonyms” in “Tree”
Author: Chen Yun (Teached by Ma Yifu Book Academy, Zhejiang Academy of Modern Thought and Civilization, Huadong Teacher Fan Daxue, China)
Source: “Social Science” Issue 5, 2024
Abstract: The common understanding of “Synonyms” in “Tree” is to regard it as a specific stage of the sequential history, or perhaps a specific order form. “Great” is regarded as an ultimate perfect order, and is placed in the past under the modern historic system, and is placed in the future under the modern historic system. As far as the deep-level logic of thinking is concerned, the understanding of “big” under the two historical systems all mistakenly regards the “big way” related to “big way” in “Tree” as the “supreme”, which leads to the war and the return of “big way” and is mistakenly regarded as the interest of “Tree”, and there is a close distance from the overall ideological structure of “Tree”. Based on the overall thinking structure of the text of “Greetings”, we can see that “sameness” is the original order experience, and the understanding of this original order experience cannot be as strong as the “travel of the way” and “hiddenness of the way”. However, this force structure seems to be constantly in the forgotten state in the previous “Greetings” discussion and “big” discussion.
1. The existing understanding of “sameness” and its problems
“Treunion” is a large text of Chinese thinking and civilization. Its opening of the great and prosperous affairs has had a grand and profound impact on future generations. In academics, China’s transformation from traditional to modern times has accompanied the upgraded movement of “Tradition”: on the one hand, “Tradition” has been paid attention to as an independent text; on the other hand, the great events and well-off affairs, originally listed at the beginning of “Tradition”, have been further separated from the overall text of “Tradition” and have been independent. In politics, “big homosexuality” and “modern prosperity” have repeatedly become the basic concepts or leaders of various modern political movements (from Chengpingtian National movement to “China’s People’s Republic of China”, from communist movement to socialist construction, China’s modern movement, etc.).
Female College Student Nursing Club
“Greeting” has a new orientation in the modern rejuvenation. This is a distinct difference between the modern historic structure structure and the traditional historic structure structure. Historical system is an expression of a certain time sequence experience that occupies a place. It is a method of responding and organizing various time experiences and giving its meaning. It focuses on the differences and convergence between the past, present and future. The modern historical system is dominated by the future and experiences the past and present from the perspective of the future.This is very different from the modern historic system that uses past as examples and historical perspectives as guides. [1] The relationship between the modern common and well-off debate and the modern historic system is that it is directed by the linear historical consciousness dominated by the future, and is even waiting for the ultimate order that needs to be realized under the framework of evolutionary theory/progressive conception. The major events under this modern historic system have different differences in terms of objectives, Utopia, Jishimo and other differences.
Target theory understands the ultimate goal of order or final improvement of form, so it actually relates to a historical completion concept. Although it cannot be realized by the inclusive amount, it can be constantly approached and participated in the present as a tuning principle. The understanding of Utopianism regards “bigness” as an eternal wish that humans cannot realize in real history, and it also relates to a mentality that is perfectly solved by a regulatory method of solving all order problems. 【2】Ji Shishu’s understanding regards “big” as an ultimate perfect order, but it can only be disposed of in the circle. The non-historical shore of history has formed structural strength with the endless order of the actual history. The above three explanations, no matter which one regards “bigness” as the perfect order in the mind, [3] no longer points to the past in history, but to the future in history, and even to the non-temporal future (eternal) related to the completion of history. Under the modern historical system, “big synonyms” are actually regarded as “the ultimate way”, that is, they are constructed by pursuing the ultimate way. As the saying goes, “the great common way is the ultimate peaceful, the great duke, the most benevolent, and the ultimate governance. Although there is a good way, there is no way to add this.” [4]
In contrast, the common understanding under the modern historical system represented by Zheng Xuan and Kong Guangda, took the past as a model and history as a guide: “big synonyms” are often equal to the era of the Five Emperors, and even expanded to the era of the Three Emperors, thus “big synonyms” and the emperor’s rule; in contrast, “well-off” is regarded as the era of the Three Kings of Xia, Shang and Zhou dynasties. Yu, Tang, Wen, Wu, Cheng, and Zhou Gong in “The Legend of the Condor Heroes” have just supported this understanding of “well-off”. In addition to linking “big coexistence” with “well-off” with “well-off” and “well-off” in historical periods, traditional coexistence and well-off also include the connotation of “big coexistence” as an example of emperors and “well-off” as a model of kings. In other words, the focus of traditional understanding such as Zheng Xuan and Kong Guangda can be divided into two levels: first, as the “big synonyms” (the era of the Five Emperors) and “well-off” (the era of the Three Kings); second, as the example of the order, as the “big synonyms” (the path of the Emperor) and “well-off” (the domineering) as the example of the order. In terms of order model, the focus of the Emperor’s Way is “virtue”, and the essence of “virtue” is giving and notThe “revocation” of the reply is concrete in the “revocation” tradition, but the “virtue” here is a pre-institutional and pre-institutional system. It is not the result of the self-institutional system creation, but the order of not being sequenced by tradition and practice. Therefore, there is a gift in the event but no gift. The focus of domineering is “gift”. The essence of “gift” lies in the dynamic balance between the application and the reporting. This application and reporting balance is reorganized and institutionalized. Therefore, it is related to the “major” system and the creation of the system system. This is why there are no “big people” in the same period, but the six righteous people appear in the well-off situation. However, the classical descriptions represented by Zheng Xuan and Kong Guangda will be regarded as a regression in history or a downgrade in order. [5] This orientation is related to Chapter 38 of “Laozi” “Drop the Tao and then virtue, then benevolence, then deeds and then righteousness, then distorts and then gifts.” This understanding that form implies the most perfect order at the beginning of history rather than the end of history, so the direction of “gift” is regarded as a return to “big homosexuality”. If “big homosexuality” fails, it will settle for the second best and return to “well-off”. The thinking movement that began in the Song Dynasty to return to the three dynasties was developed in this language.
Whether it is to place the model of perfect order in the past or deliver it to the future, these two understandings of “big homosexuality” and “well-off” have left the overall structure of the text of “Greeting”. The most basic problem is to realize “big homosexuality”, that is, to regard “big homosexuality” as a specific order of a certain period in history or perhaps a specific order form. This kind of physicalization has led to the condensation and education understanding of “big coexistence”. This understanding is only used to apply the effectiveness of “big homogeneity”, rather than to interpret the “big homogeneity” in “Travel”. As for the overall structure of the full text of “Greeting”, on the one hand, the situation structure from “bigness” to “well-off” is related to the emergence of “gifts” from hidden to obvious excitement, from the order of being given to people’s self-consideration and creation, and once the gift is created from “bigness” to “well-off”, people will no longer be able TC:
