【秦進才】董仲舒與“罷黜百家一包養價格，獨尊儒術”關系新探

Abstract:In 1910, Cai Yuanpei proposed the saying “suppressing all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone”. In 1916, Yi Baisha discussed Dong Zhongshu, who “destroyed all schools of thought and respected Confucianism alone”, and then gradually formed the relationship between Dong Zhongshu and “destroyed all schools of thought and respected Confucianism alone”. Judging from the time of countermeasures, Dong Zhongshu is not the first advocate of “destroying all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone.” From the perspective of content, Dong Zhongshu led the great tradition, and loved the subjects of the Six Arts, Confucius’ arts and “respecting Confucianism alone”. From the perspective of origin, Dong Zhongshu, who said, “destroy all schools of thought and respect Confucianism alone”, is not the real Dong Zhongshu. From the perspective of historical reality, there is no argument in Dong Zhongshu’s works that “reject all schools of thought and respect Confucianism alone”, and Dong Zhongshu also has no right to “reject all schools of thought and respect Confucianism alone”. Liushu is a civilized resource that cooperates with hundreds of schools. Emperor Hanwu “prefaced the Six Paths” and loves to study, not “respecting Confucianism alone.” In short, “destroying all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism” has nothing to do with Dong Zhongshu in terms of emotion and reason.

Keywords: Dong Zhongshu; to dispel all schools of thought and respect Confucianism alone; to make Baisha; Liuyue

Fund project: The National Social Science Fund’s critical project “Dong Zhongshu’s Examination of the World and the Annals of the Ancient Chinese Annotation and Commentary”Baoqing Webmaster (19ZDA027)

The “Dong Zhongshu and Confucianism Research” special column special contract in charge of the people’s language

In the public speaking system, when Dong Zhongshu is mentioned, people naturally think of “destroying all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone”, which is actually a deep misunderstanding. Qin Jincai was certified for the examination and Cai Yuanpei first proposed in 1910, “rejecting all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone.” Yi Baisha gave a detailed discussion in 1916, and later gradually formed a close relationship between Dong Zhongshu and “destroying all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone.” However, in Dong Zhongshu’s works, there is no “suppressing all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone”expression. What is said in the “Three Strategies of Heaven and Man” is not the first initiative of “destroying all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone”. Although Dong Zhongshu advocated the “big unity”, the six arts he admired, Confucius’ arts and the “Confucianism” in “single Confucianism”, are two related matters. The Six Paths are a civilization resource that cooperates with hundreds of schools of thought, and are not exclusive to Confucianism. Emperor Wu wrote six chapters and loved to study, not “respecting Confucianism alone.” Dong Zhongshu, who said Yi Baisha, “repeated all schools of thought and respected Confucianism alone”, is not the real Dong Zhongshu. Dong Zhongshu also did not have the real power to “destroy all schools of thought and respect Confucianism alone.” The expression “repulsed all schools of thought and respect Confucianism alone” is a statement that is easy to hear, but it may not be true and has nothing to do with Dong Zhongshu. The full text is based on the strictness and sincerity of historians, conducts standard citations, and has sufficient information on the literature and information, and is prosecuted by various schools. It is reasonable and powerless in the argument. It is the most authoritative and reliable article about the “Wu Emperor’s Respectful Affairs” so far, and has a very important academic value.

The relationship between Dong Zhongshu, the “democratic school” and “doctoral supervisor” is a senior expert in the serious project of the National Social Science Fund.

Dr. Yu Zhiping, the director of the Dong Zi Academy, Dong Zhongshu International Research Institute, and Dong Zishu’s chief expert

Dong Zhongshu’s relationship with “rejecting all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone” is a problem since the new civilization movement, and Dong Zhongshu has been criticized by some politicians and scholars. Since the transformation and opening up, Dong Zhongshu’s historical position and influence have been extremely determined because of “destroying all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone”, and has also been criticized [5-6]. Some scholars believe that they should not only recognize the positive influence of “destroying all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone” and also see its extinction impact[1]. Some scholars expressed disagreement [2]. Based on the previous research, the author tried to briefly explore the relationship between Dong Zhongshu and “suppressing all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone” to attract jade.

1. Dong Taiwan Baozhuang NetworkZhongshu was not the first advocate of “demolishing all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone”.

Since the Song and Yuan dynasties, some scholars have been questioning the lack of talent to ask for the dethrone of all schools of thought and believe that the dethrone of all schools of thought was from Dong Zhongshu. Song Zhendexiu believed that the Prime Minister asked, “The essence of quality will be produced by Zhongshu” [7]. Yuan Ma Duanli quoted Xian Gong and said, “This is what Zhongshu said, so what is the writing of the special envoy? How can Jianbai Dayishu tell me?”[3] He also believed that the comments of the comments of the comments were Dong Zhongshu. The recent money Mu believed: “If you are a person, you will be no other person. You can only pay attention to the two emperors Wen and Jing. Why did the young master suddenly find this amazing agreement when he first ruled. Moreover, the matter was not based on the foundation of the lunar calendar, but only in the “Wu Jian”. In June of that year, the lunar calendar was dismissed for not being able to hold a job. It can be seen that the lunar calendar was not in the lunar calendar. Some people said that the lunar calendar was good at that year, and Dong Zhongshu also listed it.This is true for Shin-Han, and his opinion actually comes from Zhongshu. ”[4] Mo Mu followed the insights of later generations and made detailed statements. The above statement believed that the dethrone of all schools of thought was based on Dong Zhongshu’s major suggestions. This statement was not reliable, and the author had already made a statement [8], so he would not remark it here.

(I) In the first year of Yuanguang, Dong Zhongshu’s time for making a proposal

Jian Boxun believed: “The independence of Confucianism was not only the first to advocate his views by Dong Zhongshu, and the ideological content of the new Confucianism was also laid the foundation. ”[9] Li Lingsong’s “The main examination of “Destroying all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism” believes that “Destroying all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone” should have been proposed by Dong Zhongshu [10]. Some scholars believe that Dong Zhongshu was the founder of “Destroying all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone”.

Jian Boxun and Li Lingsong said that although the law was persistent, they directly touched on the year when Dong Zhongshu’s advice. And Dong Zhongshu’s advice In the year, the History Records have not been accurately recorded, and the “Wu Emperor” in “Han Book” is inconsistent with the “Public Song of Gongsun Hongqi”; in “Dong Zhongshu” records three strategies of heaven and man but does not clarify the year and month. However, the year and month of Dong Zhongshu’s proposals were directly related to the generation and development of some reorganizations, the evaluation of Dong Zhongshu, and the evaluation of the so-called “suppressing all schools of thought and respecting Confucianism alone”. Therefore, since the Song Dynasty, many scholars have explored it,